See evidence this channel is inflated?
Submit your evidence — screenshots of chat replays, viewer/chatter ratios, or known chat-bot accounts — to add to this dossier.
Submit evidence →MODE
snapshot from our database · live mode pulls fresh telemetry off the chat gatewayDatabase snapshotLive mode →
LIVE
Kick ENGAGEMENT AUDIT
Is bongbong_irl inflated?
IRLsampled
Live engagement statistics
- Viewers
- 118
- last sample
- Followers
- —
- live · kick api
- Chatters
- 16
- active · 124 unique
- Engagement
LIVE_FEED.kick
STREAM + CHATLIVE_CHAT
STREAM_TIMELINE.kick
LIVEloading session data…
PREVIOUS_STREAMS.kick
LOADING…loading session history…
VERDICT.txt
SUSPICIOUSEngagement in the watchlist range — clear flag for review.
Session-average engagement of 14.1% (mean of 707 samples) sits in the watchlist range — below the 20% legitimacy bar for kick and only just clear of the bot floor. Not damning on its own, but a clear flag if the channel sits down here across sessions.
Methodology: how we measure engagement.
LIVE_FEED.sock
POLLINGLive ticker — sampled every 30s
last update 28s ago
Viewers
118
Active
16
Engagement
13.6%
1 sample captured
What to do next
Looking for the legit ones instead?
We maintain a vetted directory of streamers that have passed the engagement model. Get pre-cleared, brand-safe creators.
Browse the vetted directory →