See evidence this channel is inflated?
Submit your evidence — screenshots of chat replays, viewer/chatter ratios, or known chat-bot accounts — to add to this dossier.
Submit evidence →MODE
snapshot from our database · live mode pulls fresh telemetry off the chat gatewayDatabase snapshotLive mode →
LIVE
Kick ENGAGEMENT AUDIT
Is dicasdodico inflated?
ARC Raiderssampled
Live engagement statistics
- Viewers
- 148
- last sample
- Followers
- —
- live · kick api
- Chatters
- 22
- active · 85 unique
- Engagement
LIVE_FEED.kick
STREAM + CHATLIVE_CHAT
STREAM_TIMELINE.kick
LIVEloading session data…
PREVIOUS_STREAMS.kick
LOADING…loading session history…
VERDICT.txt
SEEMS LEGITLooks legitimate — pending broader review.
Session-average engagement of 15.8% (mean of 329 samples) reads as a real audience — just shy of the 20% bar we lock 'legit' against on kick. No clear fraud read; behavior over time decides whether this upgrades to a full clear.
Methodology: how we measure engagement.
LIVE_FEED.sock
POLLINGLive ticker — sampled every 30s
last update 56s ago
Viewers
148
Active
22
Engagement
14.9%
1 sample captured
What to do next
Looking for the legit ones instead?
We maintain a vetted directory of streamers that have passed the engagement model. Get pre-cleared, brand-safe creators.
Browse the vetted directory →